Garth Kiser

Dec 132014

Vln85Wmd_burned (1)It has been a while since I shared a story from my cryptocurrency experiences. As Sarah and I have settled into a routine we’ve been less motivated to write, but for the whole past year our interest in cryptocurrency has continued on a daily basis.

Week after week, without exception, for 8 months…..we invested $200 per week into a portfolio of cryptocurrencies and other “blockchain-based” projects. Overall, our results have been mostly flat. Our largest investment, bitcoin, has fallen in value by up to 50%, while some of our small investments have earned up to 10,000%

The year is soon over and we’ll go back to our traveling lifestyle, but the long-term results of this year could possibly shape the rest of our lives. We got a little taste of that this past week with a cryptocurrency project called CLAMs.

Back in the early summer I first noticed CLAMs on the cryptocurrency message board . Back then CLAMs was just a small handful of cool geeks who had produced an unknown work of genius. Reading about it the first time, I decided then and there that this was going to become a special project for me. Although I have no advanced programming skills, I wanted to contribute to the CLAMs dream in any way possible.

And so I introduced myself to the CLAMs developers in their IRC chat channel. We instantly got along well with similar visions and senses of humor. Within a few days I had created a CLAMs informational website and registered the domain Soon afterwards a member of the CLAMs team nicknamed creativecuriosity asked if I would work with her to create an “official” website.

And so it happened. A new website was born at that time, and then we created a 2.0 version of the site in the early fall. The price fell all during this time; $2USD, $1, 50 cents…….5 cents. I rode the CLAM train all the way down, buying little by little the whole time. Running the CLAMclient software with a respectable balance of CLAMs allowed me to mint hundreds more CLAMs. As of the beginning of December this stash amounted to less than $100USD, which meant an overall loss of about $150. During this time I became better acquainted with other’s on the CLAMs development team, including the mastermind named xploited. A small skilled team was slowly growing around CLAMs.

For at least as long as I’ve been involved with CLAMs, there has been a person involved who’s only known as Dooglus. He, like the other developers, has remained anonymous, only known by his screen name. Dooglus had also noticed the CLAMs post on and decided to get involved. Unlike me, Dooglus is a genius computer programmer.

Over the course of the summer Dooglus spent increasing amounts of time assisting with the development of CLAMs, His presence within the group was a great morale boost also because of his history with one of the most popular bitcoin websites ever to exist; At its height in the early summer, just-dice was a base for millions of dollars in bitcoin gambling, and also served as a revenue source for anyone who wished to invest as the house. Gamblers and investors could all do so anonymously, and business was booming.

And then in June just-dice abruptly shut down, citing Canadian regulations. All users were able to withdrawal their bitcoins, but the cryptocurrency community had lost its most beloved gambling and investment site. Beyond just being an entertainment source, many people credited just-dice with creating a demand that helped to massively drive up the bitcoin price.

Then out of the blue in early December, Dooglus announced that just-dice was coming back online the very next day, but not as a bitcoin gambling site. No, this time around it would only be accepting CLAMs! Word spread like wildfire and the price of a CLAM went straight through the roof.

CLAMs trading volume was an even bigger story than price, though. CLAMs was still listed on a single cryptocurrency exchange, Most of the summer CLAMs had traded a few dollars per day, or a couple hundred dollars on a good day. Now with the just-dice demand it was suddenly trading 50, 100, even nearly 200 bitcoins over 24-hour periods, upwards of $50,000. Not only had CLAMs set itself apart among 1000 other cryptocurrencies, it was suddenly among the top ten in trading volume. Anyone like myself who had been holding a few hundred dollars worth of CLAMs in early December, was holding a few thousand dollars in mid-December.

And that there is my best cryptocurrency story of 2014, maybe a five digit profit by the end of the year, or back to 5 cents, we’ll see!

May 162014

The United States government is broken beyond repair, corrupt beyond reform. There’s no debating that. The question is, what can we do about it?

We can move on. There’s no need to waste time repairing or tearing down our broken system. Instead, we must starve it to death by creating and transitioning to a brand new system. That new system should be leaderless, decentralized and transparent, and it should allow every individual to speak for themselves so that they will no longer have to trust representatives.

The first step in making our current system obsolete is to take away its ability to control and manipulate the money supply and the financial system. We can do that by adopting Bitcoin. Because Bitcoin is not owned, controlled or created by a single entity, but by every individual who takes part in the system, it renders both private banks and the federal reserve unnecessary, taking money out of the hands of the government and putting it in the hands of the people. Because Bitcoin is a completely transparent system, there is no need to trust representatives, board members, bankers or even other Bitcoin users.

But as I said, taking control of the money system is only step one. What about everything else? What about transit, telecommunications, food production and all of the other systems upon which we build our daily lives? These, too, must be transferred back into the hands of the people. Bitcoin and the cryptocurrency ecosystem in general have provided us with the technological foundation for implementing a peer-to-peer governance model organized through stigmergy.

Bitcoin was created, and has evolved, in a stigmergic fashion, and its protocol can be used to apply this organizational structure to everyday life.

What is Stigmergy?

Wikipedia says, “stigmergy is a form of self-organization. It produces complex, seemingly intelligent structures, without need for any planning, control, or even direct communication between the agents.”

Essentially, stigmergy is anarchy. There are no governments and no leaders. Every individual takes responsibility for him- or herself.

Stigmergy1-300x225Stigmergy begins with a seed, a single idea or proposal which is presented freely to the general populace. If the idea is interesting or necessary, others will begin to build upon it and modify it. As more people join the project, those with the most enthusiasm and expertise will form a core team which will provide the project with direction. They will begin to focus more narrowly on the aspects of the idea which interest them most, leaving other aspects undone. Others with an interest in the idea will then see that attention is needed in neglected areas and take up the unfinished work (if the undone tasks are never taken up, they’re unnecessary and therefore irrelevant). In this way, the original seed idea evolves into a decentralized system comprised of many connected nodes, each one focused on developing whichever aspect of the system interests them most.

Satoshi Nakamoto made Bitcoin’s open source code available to the general populace and anyone interested was allowed to build upon and modify it. As the project expanded, different groups of people began working on different aspects of the idea. While coders focused on code, other people built exchanges, mining hardware and news and information sources. Satoshi Nakamoto’s seed idea has now evolved into a functional decentralized worldwide financial system.

A stigmergic system organizes itself into concentric user circles which represent levels of expertise. The outer circle is comprised of Users. A User is anyone who is affected by the system. They participate in it by using it, spreading awareness about it, providing moral and financial support, and offering feedback. All information about the system and all actions taken within it are transparent, so Users can educate themselves and gain the knowledge needed to contribute to the system, thus moving into the next circle, which is comprised of Contributors. When a Contributor gains sufficient experience and expertise, they become a Member. After consistently contributing useful, high quality, peer-reviewed work for a significant period of time, that Member gains more influence within the system and may become part of the Core Team, which is comprised of those who have enough knowledge, expertise and experience to give the system direction.

In a Meritocracy (a system in which one moves toward the center and gains influence through peer reviewed contributions) accreditation, resumes, interviews and bosses are unnecessary. There is no need to seek approval or permission from an authority figure in order to begin work. You simply start contributing and your work is either accepted by those working within the system or it is not. There’s also no need to assign job titles with set duties. Everyone chooses their work because they find it fascinating or necessary or both.

This is how Bitcoin functions as well. All information is transparent. A person can educate themselves about bitcoin as much or as little as they please and contribute or not contribute to its evolution in whatever way they choose.

Stigmergy for Governance

Stigmergy, as a system of governance, is far superior to both representative and direct democracies.

In a representative democracy, officials are elected based on popularity, which could be a result of charisma and advertising rather than expertise. They then make decisions affecting all systems functioning in their geographical area regardless of how much or how little they know about those systems, and regardless of whether or not those systems actually affect them personally. They can hire experts who are willing to reveal or withhold certain types of information in exchange for bribes. None of this leads to high quality service for those who actually use a given system.

Also, elected officials do not represent every individual in their geographical area. They claim to represent the values and ideals of political parties. When a citizen subscribes to a political party, they no longer have to think for themselves or take responsibility for any decisions made. Flawed initiatives may pass because a voter’s fear of disagreeing with a group, or their desire to retain membership within it, outweigh their concern for the issue at hand. Group affiliation allows a person to reject an idea before hearing or understanding it, simply because it was proposed by an opposing group.

A direct democracy gives equal weight to all citizens, whether or not they are affected by the system in question, and regardless of their level of knowledge and expertise on the subject. Giving equal weight to the voice of the expert and the novice, the dependent and the unaffected, means that those who could do the most good within a system, and those who are most in need of their contributions, are both overshadowed by a large volume of empty votes. And because every individual cannot be expected to have the time or energy to educate and represent themselves on every issue, most people will simply vote for the most popular or the most advertised solutions.

A stigmergic government would naturally organize itself according to system, not land mass. Experts would be created within the system and promoted by reputation earned through consistent high quality peer-approved contributions, not by certification or authority figures. In a stigmergic system, no one would be able to fake, buy or schmooze their way into power, and there would be no gap between what a person promises and what they actually do. Only those who were affected by a system would choose to work within it, so meeting the user’s needs would always be the objective, and the weight of each participant’s input would match their level of expertise. All information would be transparent and the different levels of expertise would create a bridge between laymen and the core team, which anyone could cross by educating themselves and contributing work. Control and responsibility would always rest with a system’s users, so systems would always function according to the highest standard.

Stigmergy for Business

Stigmergy is also far superior to both competitive and collaborative business models, which is important in the case of public services provided by private organizations.

Progress and innovation are slow within companies that compete with one another to create the same product or provide the same service. First, time is wasted persuading the person in charge to take on a project. If they do, time and money are then consumed in advertising, patents, copyrights, and the search for contributors and investors. Collaborative organizations waste as much time and money on such things as competitive ones. On top of that, the proposer of an idea must persuade an entire group to take it on, then every member must agree on every stage of the idea’s development. And just like in a direct democracy, all voices carry equal weight so that expertise is drowned out by less knowledgeable opinions. A lot of time and energy are wasted on power struggles and the resolution of arguments. Collaboration can quickly dissolve into an exercise in personality management.

If an idea is bound to an owner, whether it be a single person or a group, there is the chance that investors and contributors are working for a person rather than an idea, and that they have no interest in the success or failure of the project itself. So if the owner of the project changes, investors and contributors may be lost and the project or idea may be delayed or die entirely. And since secrecy is paramount, only those hired by the idea’s owner(s) are allowed to work on the project, making collaboration between the best minds on the subject impossible unless they are all hired by the same organization.

Stigmergy solves all of the above problems. Let’s use Bitcoin as an example. First, no time was wasted persuading a person or group to take on the project of developing bitcoin. Satoshi Nakamoto made the idea and all the necessary information for development available to everyone for free. No one can own it, so contributors don’t need to be hired. Anyone who wants to work to develop bitcoin can do so without permission. This means collaboration between the best minds on the subject is much more likely and a far superior product can be created. Non-ownership also means that both contributors and investors come to Bitcoin of their own volition, because it is a good idea, not because they want to make an advantageous connection with a powerful person. Since everyone is working for Bitcoin, not for Bitcoin’s non-existent owner(s), the removal of a single personality cannot kill the idea. Because no group or owner must agree upon every stage of Bitcoin’s development, less time is wasted on conflict resolution and personality management. Any contributor can veer off in any direction, which is why so many alt coins exist. Finally, no money need be spent copyrighting, patenting or advertising Bitcoin because the idea is open-source and its contributors are enthusiastic enough to promote it for free.

The Future

Human civilization is in desperate need of a system of governance and a structure for business which does not allow ownership to detract from innovation. That system must be driven by ideas, not personalities, and those ideas must be accepted or rejected based on the ideas themselves, not their owners or proposers. All voices must be heard and the weight of those voices must be determined by expertise rather than bribes and charisma. Systems must be built to best serve those who use and are affected by them.

All of the above can be accomplished through stigmergy. It created Bitcoin and Bitcoin is moving us into an open-source world in which there will be no governments, no leaders and no owners. Instead, there will be individuals recognizing human needs and taking action to fulfill those needs. We will no longer elect others to represent us. We will no longer seek permission, instruction, assignment or aid from those who would use them to manipulate us. We will no longer look outside ourselves for solutions to our problems.

For too long, people have chosen to follow blindly and without question, refusing to think, make decisions or take responsibility. Thus we have placed ourselves under the rule of those who do not have our best interests in mind.

Remember: Power is not taken by leaders, it is given to them by those who choose to follow.

We must refuse to follow.

Technology has given us the power, as autonomous individuals, to plan and carry out our own solutions. We must trust ourselves to be strong, intelligent and humane enough to govern our own communities. When we believe ourselves to be as capable as we think others are, we begin to direct the courses of our own lives and cease to submit to the will of a broken government.

Our future is stigmergy. Stigmergy is anarchy. Anarchy is not chaos. It is people using the tools they’ve been given to take responsibility for their own lives rather than waiting for others to do everything for them.

Once we have control of our own financial system, we can use the Bitcoin protocol to take control of all our other systems. That’s where things like Decentralized Autonomous Corporations and Smart Contracts come into play. But this article is already long enough, so I’ll have to discuss those elsewhere.

A special thanks to Heather Marsh for the P2P governance inspiration that she gave us in her writings and our time together at the 2012 Berlin Biennale.

Mar 122014



Photo via The Free Network Foundation

The Bitcoin protocol is a monumental leap towards a peer-governed future, but what happens when the Internet goes down? This is a common question, and a very valid one.

Any large-scale Internet outage or blockage would surely be very bad for any software that relies on blockchain verifications. Right now cryptocurrencies are the only major use of blockchain technology, but usage will soon see explosive growth as new applications are being realized each day.

The question is, what happens to such a distributed verification systems when certain parts of the network become isolated? Imagine a widespread global conflict in which all satellites and undersea cables are sabotaged. The Internet’s distributed nature is designed so that connected computers will remain so, but no longer would they remain connected to computers outside of their region.

In such a scenario, blockchain verifications would only take place regionally, with the result being that each region develops forked versions of the blockchain. When the regions became connected again there would be no global consensus possible for any transactions that took place during the disconnected period, and therefore such transactions would only be recognized regionally. This is obviously unacceptable for any global digital currency.


HF(shortwave) Modem(photo via

To combat this scenario the Bitcoin Foundation and all other interested parties should collaboratively build and maintain a global network of solar-powered mobile blockchain servers connected to HF modems. These units would be stored in undisclosed locations, connected to the Internet, designed to automatically begin transmitting the blockchain via HF modem in the event of an Internet failure.

It must be assumed that these units would be targeted by sophisticated weapons during warfare, including conventional explosives and frequency jamming systems. Please comment with any technical corrections and/or ideas how these units would be designed and secured.

Feb 182014

IMAG0001Pillars of civilization are decentralizing at a rapid pace, our future becoming less clear with each passing day. There are those among us who reject this great unknown, and those like myself who will fight for even the slightest possibility of a future that is not forever inhibited by the great repulsive forces of centralization.

One hundred years ago they called them anarchists, a borderless force to be reckoned. According to “propoganda of the deed“, political and commercial leaders of the world were assassinated at an astonishing rate.

The anarchist movement was eventually crushed by the powers that be, and while much deadly force was indeed used to do so, violence was not the primary tool used to pacify the anarchists.

Used intentionally or not, that primary tool was commercial imperialism. The doors of”free trade” were forcefully opened throughout the world during the early 20th century, primarily by the United States. Not only was the anarchist movement quelled, but the Unitied States remains the most powerful Centralist force in the world to this day.

This solution against anarchism was painfully simple. The masses were distracted with a middle-class income for a generation while the Centralists laid low, gathering strength, reorganizing and plotting their next big move. Now they’re back with a vengeance, as is evident in events such as the 2008 financial collapse and the bank bailouts that followed.

Likewise, the trusty opposition has also returned to the stage, but they were merely laying low too, plotting their next move. They’re smarter this time, and not called anarchists anymore, but equally nasty new names like “techno-libertarians”. They remember how the Centralist powers wormed back into favor with the masses so many years ago, and now they’re ready to use those same wormy methods against them.

The masses shall experience prosperity once again. And this time that prosperity will persist because it shall be found through the sustainable means of decentralization. This time around the technological tools are at hand to finally maintain the upperhand. The centuries-old battle against the greedy Centralist minority does not seem likely to end in our forseeable future, but then again, our future is less clear each day.

Cold fusion

 (Click on the 3 images above to read about decentralized systems)

Feb 092014

CEEE8426-41DE-49F2-A8D3-F00C97D8CC2BA mutual friend introduced us via email to Monte back in December, at which time he drove from Los Angeles to Patagonia, Arizona and spent a few creative days with us. One evening we watched the movie Blue Valentine, then Monte filmed us talking about that movie for his blog called The Final Image. He just completed a wonderful editing job of that footage, and here it is!

Feb 062014

BitcoinwithsybolMy paychecks have started arriving so cryptocurrency buying has resumed! This past week I purchased $100 of Bitcoins, or about .1BTC, and used them to buy a couple dozen other types of cryptocurrencies on three exchange websites. By the end of the month I plan to increase my cryptocurrency purchases to $250/week.

One way we’ll use these currencies is to distribute small amounts of them for free among a new local cryptocurrency group that we’re forming. Free distributions, or “faucets” as they are called online, are a fundamental part of cryptocurrency development that also must be practiced at the local level. The Bitcoin Association of Catalina will provide all its services for free, including assisting local businesses to set up point-of-sale(POS) Bitcoin payment systems on mobile devices. My hope is that group members will branch off to do such things as forming their own businesses setting up POS systems, and that the group model itself will expand to surrounding communities. As for Sarah and me, our money will be made as early adopters of cryptocurrency, with our holdings expanding in value each day. The Bitcoin Association of Catalina is our way of paying for this privileged.